Debate over women serving in combat roles reignited in America as Donald Trump takes office
January 22, 2025
Pete Hegseth, Donald Trump’s nominee for secretary of defense, is a controversial figure facing allegations of sexual assault and excessive drinking. He is also vocal in his criticism of women serving in combat roles, asserting that their inclusion undermines military effectiveness and cohesion. Hegseth claims physical differences, such as disparities in “bone density and lung capacity,” render women less suited to the physical demands of combat, particularly in infantry roles. He argues that the integration of women has led to lowered standards and increased injuries, citing concerns about the readiness and cohesion of units where women serve alongside men.
However, Hegseth's arguments regarding physicality and cohesion fail to stand up to evidence. Data shows that female soldiers are performing at a higher standard than ever before, with 143 women successfully graduating from the Army's rigorous Ranger School in 2024. Despite claims of injury rates, studies find no significant difference in long-term readiness between mixed-gender and all-male units when adequate training and support are provided. Furthermore, cohesion, often cited as a critical factor in combat effectiveness, is more strongly influenced by mutual respect and shared goals than by gender. The integration of women has, in fact, strengthened unit performance by increasing diversity and adaptability on the battlefield.
Critics of Hegseth’s stance emphasise that his arguments overlook the broader strategic advantages of inclusivity. With women constituting 17.5% of the U.S. military's active-duty force and 21.6% of the selected reserve in 2022, their contributions are essential to addressing modern combat challenges, including counterinsurgency operations and peacekeeping missions. By dismissing these contributions and focusing narrowly on outdated notions of physicality, Hegseth risks undermining the progress and effectiveness of a modernized, diverse military force.
By amplifying evidence-based solutions and championing initiatives that promote women as leaders, SecurityWomen continues to advocate for women's meaningful participation in the armed forces, policing and peacekeeping.
To read the full story, see here
January 22, 2025
Debate over women serving in combat roles reignited in America as Donald Trump takes office
January 22, 2025
Pete Hegseth, Donald Trump’s nominee for secretary of defense, is a controversial figure facing allegations of sexual assault and excessive drinking. He is also vocal in his criticism of women serving in combat roles, asserting that their inclusion undermines military effectiveness and cohesion. Hegseth claims physical differences, such as disparities in “bone density and lung capacity,” render women less suited to the physical demands of combat, particularly in infantry roles. He argues that the integration of women has led to lowered standards and increased injuries, citing concerns about the readiness and cohesion of units where women serve alongside men.
However, Hegseth's arguments regarding physicality and cohesion fail to stand up to evidence. Data shows that female soldiers are performing at a higher standard than ever before, with 143 women successfully graduating from the Army's rigorous Ranger School in 2024. Despite claims of injury rates, studies find no significant difference in long-term readiness between mixed-gender and all-male units when adequate training and support are provided. Furthermore, cohesion, often cited as a critical factor in combat effectiveness, is more strongly influenced by mutual respect and shared goals than by gender. The integration of women has, in fact, strengthened unit performance by increasing diversity and adaptability on the battlefield.
Critics of Hegseth’s stance emphasise that his arguments overlook the broader strategic advantages of inclusivity. With women constituting 17.5% of the U.S. military's active-duty force and 21.6% of the selected reserve in 2022, their contributions are essential to addressing modern combat challenges, including counterinsurgency operations and peacekeeping missions. By dismissing these contributions and focusing narrowly on outdated notions of physicality, Hegseth risks undermining the progress and effectiveness of a modernized, diverse military force.
By amplifying evidence-based solutions and championing initiatives that promote women as leaders, SecurityWomen continues to advocate for women's meaningful participation in the armed forces, policing and peacekeeping.
To read the full story, see here
